Imagine if UFC events were shorter, more intense, and left you craving more instead of feeling drained after hours of fights. That’s exactly what Jon Anik, the UFC’s lead commentator, is advocating for—and it’s sparking a heated debate. Anik recently revealed that if he were in Dana White’s shoes, he’d make a bold move: cut 150 fighters from the roster to streamline events and make them more fan-friendly. But here’s where it gets controversial—is slashing nearly a quarter of the roster the solution, or would it do more harm than good? Let’s dive in.
The question of what changes the UFC needs isn’t new. Fans and insiders alike have been vocal about everything from fighter pay and bonuses to penalties for unsportsmanlike conduct. On platforms like Bloody Elbow, enthusiasts have shared their wish lists for Dana White, ranging from financial improvements to stricter rules. And this is the part most people miss: even those deeply embedded in the organization, like Anik, believe the UFC’s biggest issue isn’t in the octagon—it’s the length of the events themselves.
Anik, who took over as the lead play-by-play commentator in 2017, has become a trusted voice for fans. His recent comments on the Spinnin Backfist MMA Show shed light on his vision for a more streamlined UFC. ‘Our events are way too long,’ he stated. ‘We should have 10 or 11 fights instead of 15. Even cutting events down to five or six hours from eight would be a step in the right direction.’ He argues that asking fans to commit eight hours, 41 times a year, is a tall order—especially when the UFC juggles television partners, a roster of over 600 fighters, and the annual influx of 50 new athletes from the Contender Series.
But Anik’s solution isn’t without its critics. Cutting 150 fighters would undoubtedly trim the fat, but at what cost? Would it stifle up-and-coming talent? Or is it a necessary sacrifice for a better fan experience? Anik admits his perspective might be ‘selfish,’ given his role as a broadcaster, but he’s not alone in thinking the UFC could benefit from a leaner approach. ‘I’d cut 150 fighters,’ he said. ‘Make it a more ingestible, palatable sporting event.’
As Anik prepares to lead the UFC’s debut on Paramount+ in 2026, alongside Joe Rogan, Daniel Cormier, and new desk anchor Kate Scott, his comments add fuel to an already fiery discussion. Is he onto something, or is he overlooking the value of a massive roster? What do you think? Should the UFC prioritize shorter events, even if it means fewer fighters get their shot? Let us know in the comments—this debate is far from over.
